Republican push for new laws to silence and criminalize protest is bad sign

Three bills passed the House of Representatives, all three of which reverse the progress made under Governor John Bel Edwards, and are aimed at criminalizing protests and legalizing injury to protests, all under the guise of public safety.  Rep. Adrian Fisher dropped the ball on all three of these issues, and Rep. Moore supported one of the three bad bills.

House Bill 173, with its contentious provision criminalizing the approach of law enforcement officers during the performance of their duties, stands as a stark emblem of the increasing militarization of police forces and the growing chasm between law enforcement and the communities they serve. The bill’s proponents argue for the necessity of such measures in the name of officer safety and public order. Yet, one cannot help but lament the chilling effect this will undoubtedly have on peaceful protests and the constitutional right to free assembly.

The ACLU of Louisiana and the Louisiana AFL-CIO are rightly concerned: when citizens must fear imprisonment or fines for merely being in the vicinity of a police officer, democracy is in peril.

Rep. Adrian Fisher’s support for HB 173, aligning with the notion of enhanced officer safety, contrasts sharply with Rep. Pat Moore’s opposition. Moore’s stance echoes the fears of many that these laws will disproportionately affect marginalized and black communities, further entrenching the systemic barriers they face.

Both Fisher and Moore cast votes in favor of HB205. This bill’s aggressive stance on rioting, framing it within the context of racketeering charges, is a broad stroke that threatens to blur the lines between violent upheaval and peaceful, albeit passionate, protest. It labels protests as riots and then slaps heavy fines and racketeering charges on protestors. It is a step towards criminalizing dissent, silencing voices under the guise of maintaining order.

House Bill 383 adds fuel to the fire, offering legal protection to drivers who injure protesters on the roadways. This bill, supported by Fisher but opposed by Moore, represents a dangerous precedent, effectively dehumanizing protesters and placing them in the crosshairs of potentially lethal force. It gives drivers the right to run over protesters in the roadway if the driver fears for the safety of himself or passengers.  It is a grim reminder of the lengths to which the legislature is willing to go to suppress civil unrest.

The passage of these bills marks a dark chapter in Louisiana’s legislative history, one that threatens to undermine the very principles of freedom and justice. The division among Black representatives from Districts 16 and 17—Fisher’s support and Moore’s opposition—highlights the complex and often painful choices faced by lawmakers in balancing public safety with civil liberties.

As we lament the passage of House Bills 173, 205, and 383, we must call upon our representatives to rally in defense of our liberties before they are irrevocably eroded.

We should stand united in opposition to these measures, for the sake of all who cherish freedom and justice.